Research Article
Vaka Yöneticileri için Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Hizmetlerine Uyum Ölçeği (VİTU): Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği
Abstract
Amaç: Kronik ruhsal rahatsızlığa sahip bireylere sağlanan hizmetler hastaların katılımı düşük olduğunda tedavinin istenilen düzeyde etki etmemesiyle sonuçlanabildiğinden önem verilmesi gereken bir durumdur. Bu araştırmanın amacı, hastaların toplum ruh sağlığı hizmetlerine katılımı ölçmek için Vaka Yöneticileri için Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Hizmetlerine Uyum Ölçeği'nin (VİTU) geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir.
Yöntem: Araştırma, Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Merkezi'nde en az bir yıl süreyle izlenen şizofreni tanısı almış 119 hasta örneklemiyle tamamlanmıştır.
Bulgular: Toplanan verilere doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Güvenirlik ölçümleri iç tutarlılık ve test-tekrar test ölçümleri ile yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin DFA sonuçlarına göre RMSEA;0.081, GFI; 0.872, AGFI;0.809, RMR;0.035, NFI;0.926, CFI;0.966 değerlerine sahip olduğu, Ölçeğin toplam Cronbach's Alpha değeri 0.957, genel test – tekrar test korelasyon değeri(r) 0.684’dir.
Sonuç: Bulgular, Vaka Yöneticileri için Toplum Ruh Sağlığı Hizmetlerine Uyum Ölçeği’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir.
Supporting Institution
Yok
Project Number
-
Thanks
Araştırma kapsamında ölçeğin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması aşamasında uzman görüşlerine başvurulan ve desteğini esirgemeyen Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Bilge’ye, Doç. Dr. Fahriye Oflaz’a, Prof. Dr. Fatma Eker’e, Prof. Dr. Gülsüm Ançel’e araştırmaya verdikleri bu katkıdan dolayı teşekkür ederiz.
References
- 1. Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Cannon TD, O'Donovan M, Correll CU, Kane JM, van Os J, Insel TR. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Nov 12;1:15067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.67. PMID: 27189524.
- 2. Vita A, Barlati S. Recovery from schizophrenia: is it possible? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018 May;31(3):246-255. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000407. PMID: 29474266.
- 3. Veerman SRT, Schulte PFJ, de Haan L. Treatment for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Review. Drugs 77, 1423–1459, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-017-0789-y.
- 4. Kingston T, Scully PJ, Browne DJ, Baldwin PA, Kinsella A, O'Callaghan E, Russell V, Waddington JL. Functional outcome and service engagement in major depressive disorder with psychotic features: comparisons with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder in a 6-year follow-up of the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study (CAMFEPS). CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Jul;24(7):633-640. doi: 10.1111/cns.12836. Epub 2018 Mar 25. PMID: 29575682; PMCID: PMC6490013.
- 5. Johansen R, Hestad K, Iversen VC, Agartz I, Sundet K, Andreassen OA, Melle I. Cognitive and clinical factors are associated with service engagement in early-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Mar;199(3):176-82. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820bc2f9. PMID: 21346488.
- 6. Macbeth A, Gumley A, Schwannauer M, Fisher R. Service engagement in first episode psychosis: clinical and premorbid correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 May;201(5):359-64. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31828e0e19. PMID: 23588222.
- 7. Johansen R, Iversen VC, Melle I. Therapeutic alliance in early schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 12, 14 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-14
- 8. Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. J Ment Health. 2002;11(2):191-8. doi: 10.1080/09638230020023570-2. PMID: 21208145.
- 9. Taşçı K, Mete S. Postpartum Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 10(2): 20-29.
- 10. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, PrenticeHall, Inc., USA, 1998.
- 11. King JR, Jackson DA.Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis. Environmetrics, 1999, 10: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199901/02)10:1 <67::AID-ENV336>3.0.CO;2-0.
- 12. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Vol. 2). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.
- 13. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar JL. OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 2006 6(4), 311-360.
- 14. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger M, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2003, 6(2), 23-74. From http://www.mpr-online.de
- 15. Sümer N. Yapisal Esitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 2000, 3, 49-73.
- 16. Tosun C. Adaptation of chemistry perception questionnaire into Turkish: a validity and reliability study with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 2013, 7.1: 142-165.
- 17. Morisky DE, Gren LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986;24:67-74.
- 18. Thompson K, Kulkarni J, Sergejew AA. Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophrenia research, 2000, 42.3: 241-247.
- 19. Aker T, Üstünsoy S, Kuğu N, Yazıcı A. Psikotik bozukluğu olan hastalarda tedaviye uyum ve ilaç tedavisine uyumsuzluğu değerlendirme ölçeği, 36. Ulusal Psikiyatri Kongresi, Poster Bildirisi, 2000.
- 20. Hall M, Meaden A, Smith J, Jones C. Brief report: The development and psychometric properties of an observer-rated measure of engagement with mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 2001, 10.4: 457-465.
- 21. Meaden A, Hacker D, Villiers A, Carbourne J, Paget A. Developing a measurement of engagement: the Residential Rehabilitation Engagement Scale for psychosis. Journal of Mental Health, 2012, 21.2: 182-191.
- 22. O'brien A, White S, Fahmy R, Singh, SP. The development and validation of the SOLES, a new scale measuring engagement with mental health services in people with psychosis. Journal of Mental Health, 2009, 18.6: 510-522.
Year 2024,
Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 117 - 123, 01.01.2024
Abstract
Objective: When patient attendance is low, services that provided to patients with chronic mental illness may result not having the desired treatment effect, so it is a situation that needs attention. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Service Engagement Scale (SES), to measure engagement with community mental health services.
Method: Study completed with sample of 119 clients diagnosed with schizophrenia, followed-up at least for one year in a Community Mental Health Center.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis has been carried out for collected data. Reliability measurements were carried out with internal consistency and test-retest measurements. According to the CFA results, RMSEA was 0.081, GFI; 0.872, AGFI; 0.809, RMR; 0.035, NFI; 0.926, CFI; 0.966. The total Cronbach's Alpha value of the scale was 0.957 and test-retest correlation value(r) was 0.684.
Conclusion: The findings show that the Turkish version of the Service Engagement Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
Project Number
-
References
- 1. Kahn RS, Sommer IE, Murray RM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Cannon TD, O'Donovan M, Correll CU, Kane JM, van Os J, Insel TR. Schizophrenia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 Nov 12;1:15067. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.67. PMID: 27189524.
- 2. Vita A, Barlati S. Recovery from schizophrenia: is it possible? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018 May;31(3):246-255. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000407. PMID: 29474266.
- 3. Veerman SRT, Schulte PFJ, de Haan L. Treatment for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Review. Drugs 77, 1423–1459, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-017-0789-y.
- 4. Kingston T, Scully PJ, Browne DJ, Baldwin PA, Kinsella A, O'Callaghan E, Russell V, Waddington JL. Functional outcome and service engagement in major depressive disorder with psychotic features: comparisons with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder in a 6-year follow-up of the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study (CAMFEPS). CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Jul;24(7):633-640. doi: 10.1111/cns.12836. Epub 2018 Mar 25. PMID: 29575682; PMCID: PMC6490013.
- 5. Johansen R, Hestad K, Iversen VC, Agartz I, Sundet K, Andreassen OA, Melle I. Cognitive and clinical factors are associated with service engagement in early-phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Mar;199(3):176-82. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820bc2f9. PMID: 21346488.
- 6. Macbeth A, Gumley A, Schwannauer M, Fisher R. Service engagement in first episode psychosis: clinical and premorbid correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 May;201(5):359-64. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31828e0e19. PMID: 23588222.
- 7. Johansen R, Iversen VC, Melle I. Therapeutic alliance in early schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 12, 14 (2013). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-14
- 8. Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. J Ment Health. 2002;11(2):191-8. doi: 10.1080/09638230020023570-2. PMID: 21208145.
- 9. Taşçı K, Mete S. Postpartum Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2010; 10(2): 20-29.
- 10. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, PrenticeHall, Inc., USA, 1998.
- 11. King JR, Jackson DA.Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis. Environmetrics, 1999, 10: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199901/02)10:1 <67::AID-ENV336>3.0.CO;2-0.
- 12. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Vol. 2). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.
- 13. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar JL. OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 2006 6(4), 311-360.
- 14. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger M, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2003, 6(2), 23-74. From http://www.mpr-online.de
- 15. Sümer N. Yapisal Esitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 2000, 3, 49-73.
- 16. Tosun C. Adaptation of chemistry perception questionnaire into Turkish: a validity and reliability study with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 2013, 7.1: 142-165.
- 17. Morisky DE, Gren LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986;24:67-74.
- 18. Thompson K, Kulkarni J, Sergejew AA. Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophrenia research, 2000, 42.3: 241-247.
- 19. Aker T, Üstünsoy S, Kuğu N, Yazıcı A. Psikotik bozukluğu olan hastalarda tedaviye uyum ve ilaç tedavisine uyumsuzluğu değerlendirme ölçeği, 36. Ulusal Psikiyatri Kongresi, Poster Bildirisi, 2000.
- 20. Hall M, Meaden A, Smith J, Jones C. Brief report: The development and psychometric properties of an observer-rated measure of engagement with mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 2001, 10.4: 457-465.
- 21. Meaden A, Hacker D, Villiers A, Carbourne J, Paget A. Developing a measurement of engagement: the Residential Rehabilitation Engagement Scale for psychosis. Journal of Mental Health, 2012, 21.2: 182-191.
- 22. O'brien A, White S, Fahmy R, Singh, SP. The development and validation of the SOLES, a new scale measuring engagement with mental health services in people with psychosis. Journal of Mental Health, 2009, 18.6: 510-522.
There are 22 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Clinical Sciences |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | - |
| Early Pub Date | January 15, 2024 |
| Publication Date | January 1, 2024 |
| Submission Date | August 3, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 10 Issue: 1 |
