Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit

Sibel Gokcay Bek; Serkan Bakırdöğen; Necmi Eren; Yusuf Hanazay; Betul Kalender Gonullu

doi:10.5798/dicletip.988064

Research Article

Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit

Year 2021, Volume: 48 Issue: 3, 523 - 528, 01.09.2021

Sibel Gokcay Bek Serkan Bakırdöğen Necmi Eren Yusuf Hanazay Betul Kalender Gonullu

https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988064

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and characteristics of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in one center.
Method: The data of cases treated with therapeutic plasmapheresis at the university hospital between 2007 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. 445 TPE and 391 DFPP sessions were done totally.
Results: In the 5.5 years, in 116 cases 445 TPE and 391 DFPP sessions were done. The mean age was 46.61±16.83 years. There were 49 female and 67 male patients. Guillain-Barre syndrome ( 8.6%) was the commonly encountered indication for neurological diseases, glomerulonephritis ( 25%) was the leading indication for the renal-related diseases. Skin involvement due to diabetes mellitus (13.8%) and Pemphigus Vulgaris (5.2%) were the dermatological diseases. Complication rates were similar between DFPP and TPE sessions (p= 0.411).
Conclusion: TPE and DFPP are safe and vital membrane separation techniques used as a treatment for a wide spectrum of diseases. These treatments can be safely done in hemodialysis units intensive care units and DFPP should be considered for the therapy refractory neurological diseases.

Keywords

exchange, Double filtration plasmapheresis, Theurapetic plasma exchange

References

1. Stegmayr B, Ramlow W, Balogun RA . Beyond Dialysis: Current and Emerging Blood Purification Techniques. Semin. Dial. 2012; 25: 207–13.
2. Williams M E, Balogun RA. Principles of separation: Indications and therapeutic targets for plasma exchange. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2014; 9: 181–90.

Year 2021, Volume: 48 Issue: 3, 523 - 528, 01.09.2021

Sibel Gokcay Bek Serkan Bakırdöğen Necmi Eren Yusuf Hanazay Betul Kalender Gonullu

https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988064

Abstract

References

1. Stegmayr B, Ramlow W, Balogun RA . Beyond Dialysis: Current and Emerging Blood Purification Techniques. Semin. Dial. 2012; 25: 207–13.
2. Williams M E, Balogun RA. Principles of separation: Indications and therapeutic targets for plasma exchange. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2014; 9: 181–90.

There are 2 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Subjects	Health Care Administration
Journal Section	Original Articles
Authors	Sibel Gokcay Bek This is me Serkan Bakırdöğen This is me Necmi Eren Yusuf Hanazay This is me Betul Kalender Gonullu This is me
Publication Date	September 1, 2021
Submission Date	May 10, 2021
Published in Issue	Year 2021 Volume: 48 Issue: 3

Cite

APA	Gokcay Bek, S., Bakırdöğen, S., Eren, N., Hanazay, Y., et al. (2021). Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 48(3), 523-528. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988064
AMA	Gokcay Bek S, Bakırdöğen S, Eren N, Hanazay Y, Kalender Gonullu B. Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit. diclemedj. September 2021;48(3):523-528. doi:10.5798/dicletip.988064
Chicago	Gokcay Bek, Sibel, Serkan Bakırdöğen, Necmi Eren, Yusuf Hanazay, and Betul Kalender Gonullu. “Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 48, no. 3 (September 2021): 523-28. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988064.
EndNote	Gokcay Bek S, Bakırdöğen S, Eren N, Hanazay Y, Kalender Gonullu B (September 1, 2021) Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 48 3 523–528.
IEEE	S. Gokcay Bek, S. Bakırdöğen, N. Eren, Y. Hanazay, and B. Kalender Gonullu, “Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit”, diclemedj, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 523–528, 2021, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.988064.
ISNAD	Gokcay Bek, Sibel et al. “Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 48/3 (September 2021), 523-528. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.988064.
JAMA	Gokcay Bek S, Bakırdöğen S, Eren N, Hanazay Y, Kalender Gonullu B. Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit. diclemedj. 2021;48:523–528.
MLA	Gokcay Bek, Sibel et al. “Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit”. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, vol. 48, no. 3, 2021, pp. 523-8, doi:10.5798/dicletip.988064.
Vancouver	Gokcay Bek S, Bakırdöğen S, Eren N, Hanazay Y, Kalender Gonullu B. Comparison of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Double Filtration Plasmapheresis: Five Year Experience of Nephrology Unit. diclemedj. 2021;48(3):523-8.