Abstract
References
- 1. Page E, Kostantinis S, Karacsonyi J, et al. Incidence, treatment and outcomes of coronary artery dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 2023;35(7):E341-e54.
- 2. Boyle AJ, Chan M, Dib J, et al. Catheter-induced coronary artery dissection: risk factors, prevention and management. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 2006;18(10):500-3.
- 3. Brilakis E. Manual of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. In: Brilakis E, editor. Manual of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Academic Press; 2021.
- 4. Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, et al. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. The American journal of cardiology. 1991;68(5):467-71.
- 5. De Palma R, Aminian A, Muller O, et al. The prevention and management of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. 2024. In: The PCR-EAPCI Percutaneous Interventional Cardiovascular Medicine Textbook [Internet]. Europa Group, [accessed 28.01.2024].
- 6. Prashant Ponangi U, Menon R, Kapadia A. Successful angioplasty of three cases of coronary artery dissections using hydrophilic wires. Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology. 2014;10(4):289-93.
Abstract
This case report presents a conservative management approach to a potentially hazardous complication, iatrogenic coronary artery dissection (ICAD), occurring during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient, a 60-year-old woman with a history of chronic hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus, presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. During the PCI, an antegrade coronary dissection was observed, leading to the termination of the procedure. Post-procedure, the patient was managed conservatively with standard coronary artery disease treatment. Follow-up angiography showed complete healing of the dissection area, and no adverse cardiovascular events occurred during a 3-month follow-up period. This report highlights the importance of early diagnosis and careful management of ICAD. It stresses the need for further research into long-term outcomes and effectiveness of different treatment approaches for patients with ICAD.
Keywords
Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection, percutaneous coronary intervention conservative management hydrophilic wire complications
References
- 1. Page E, Kostantinis S, Karacsonyi J, et al. Incidence, treatment and outcomes of coronary artery dissection during percutaneous coronary intervention. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 2023;35(7):E341-e54.
- 2. Boyle AJ, Chan M, Dib J, et al. Catheter-induced coronary artery dissection: risk factors, prevention and management. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 2006;18(10):500-3.
- 3. Brilakis E. Manual of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. In: Brilakis E, editor. Manual of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Academic Press; 2021.
- 4. Huber MS, Mooney JF, Madison J, et al. Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty. The American journal of cardiology. 1991;68(5):467-71.
- 5. De Palma R, Aminian A, Muller O, et al. The prevention and management of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. 2024. In: The PCR-EAPCI Percutaneous Interventional Cardiovascular Medicine Textbook [Internet]. Europa Group, [accessed 28.01.2024].
- 6. Prashant Ponangi U, Menon R, Kapadia A. Successful angioplasty of three cases of coronary artery dissections using hydrophilic wires. Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology. 2014;10(4):289-93.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Cardiology |
| Journal Section | Case Report |
| Authors | |
| Early Pub Date | April 1, 2024 |
| Publication Date | March 6, 2024 |
| Submission Date | February 5, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | March 2, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 5 Issue: 1 |
