Abstract
Intrauterine devices are generally preferred as they provide long-term contraception and are well-tolerated. Although intrauterine devices are an effective and safe contraceptive method, it can rarely be associated with significant complications such as uterine rupture and migration to the adjacent organs. Herein, we present the case of a 29 years old woman with a history of an intrauterine device inserted 10 years ago that was later complicated by the migration of the intrauterine device to the rectum.
Keywords
References
- 1. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1987;753:1-91.
- 2. Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, et al. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1546-51.
- Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002;66:105-8.
- 4. Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception 2012;85:15-8.
- 5. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, et al. Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998;57:251-5.
- 6. Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, et al. Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 2007;75:96-100.
- 7. McCombie JJ, Le Fur R. Colonoscopic removal of an ectopic intrauterine device. ANZ J Surg 2012;82:369-70.
- 8. Beard RJ. Unusual presentation of translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Lancet. 1981;1:837.
Abstract
Rahim içi araçlar uzun süreli kontrasepsiyon sağlaması ve genel olarak iyi tolere edilmelerinden dolayı sık tercih edilirler. Genellikle güvenli bir kontrasepsiyon yöntemi olmasına rağmen nadiren uterus perforasyonu ve kom-şu organlara migrasyon gibi önemli bazı komplikasyonlara yol açabilirler. Burada 29 yaşındaki olguya 10 yıl önce takılan intrauterin aracın nadir bir komplikasyonu olan rektuma migrasyonunu bildirdik.
Keywords
References
- 1. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1987;753:1-91.
- 2. Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, et al. Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1546-51.
- Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, et al. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002;66:105-8.
- 4. Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception 2012;85:15-8.
- 5. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, et al. Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998;57:251-5.
- 6. Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, et al. Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 2007;75:96-100.
- 7. McCombie JJ, Le Fur R. Colonoscopic removal of an ectopic intrauterine device. ANZ J Surg 2012;82:369-70.
- 8. Beard RJ. Unusual presentation of translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Lancet. 1981;1:837.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 29, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 23 Issue: 2 |