Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 780 - 784, 30.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1310131

Abstract

Supporting Institution

Yok

References

  • Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health-2021 Update: Male Sexual Dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80(3):333-357. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007
  • de la Peyronie F: Sur quelques obstacles qui s’opposent à l’éjaculation naturelle de la semence. Mem Acad Roy Chir. 1743:1:425.
  • Rosen R, Catania J, Lue T, et al. Impact of Peyronie's disease on sexual and psychosocial functioning: qualitative findings in patients and controls. J Sex Med. 2008;5(8):1977-1984. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00883.x
  • Ziegelmann MJ, Trost LW, Russo GI, Levine LA. Peyronie's disease intervention studies: an exploration of modern-era challenges in study design and evaluating treatment outcomes. J Sex Med. 2020;17(3):364-377. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.271
  • Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Conti SL, Turek P, Lue T. Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med. 2008;5(9):2179-2184. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00949.x
  • Akkus E, Kadioglu A, Esen A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in Turkey: a population-based study. Eur Urol. 2002;41(3):298-304. doi:10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00027-1
  • Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 1997;158(6):2149-2152. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68184-9
  • Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie's disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):27-34. doi:10.1038/aja.2012.92
  • Akkus E, Ozkara H, Alici B, et al. Incision and venous patch graft in the surgical treatment of penile curvature in Peyronie's disease. Eur Urol. 2001;40(5):531-537. doi:10.1159/000049831
  • Ainayev Y, Zhanbyrbekuly U, Gaipov A, et al. Comparison of Technical Success and Adverse Events of Plaque Incision and grafting methods in patients with peyronie's disease: tunica vaginalis versus buccal mucosa. Urology. 2022;170:226-233. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.063
  • Ainayev Y, Zhanbyrbekuly U, Gaipov A, et al. Surgical reconstruction of penile curvature due to Peyronie's disease by plaque incision and buccal mucosa graft. J Sex Med. 2021;18(7):1308-1316. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.04.009
  • Cormio L, Mancini V, Massenio P, et al. Combined plaque incision, buccal mucosa grafting, and additional tunica albuginea plication for peyronie's disease. Sex Med. 2019;7(1):48-53. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2018.11.002
  • Chow AK, Sidelsky SA, Levine LA. Surgical outcomes of plaque excision and grafting and supplemental tunica albuginea plication for treatment of peyronie's disease with severe compound curvature. J Sex Med. 2018;15(7):1021-1029. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.642
  • Barrett-Harlow B, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. New Developments in surgical treatment for penile size preservation in Peyronie's disease. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(1):156-166. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.07.001
  • .Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Sansalone S. Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie's disease using circular and longitudinal grafting. BJU Int. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E213-E219. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11582.x
  • Tahra A, Küçük EV, İnkaya A. Peyroni hastalığının hafif ve orta şiddetli kurvatür tedavisinde plikasyon ve greftleme cerrahisi ile sonuçlarımız. Androl Bul. 2017;19:6-9. https://doi.org/10.24898/ tandro.2017.46547.
  • Başer A, Çelen S, Bütün S, et al. Peyroni cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörler. Pam Tıp Derg. 2020;13(3):705-713.

The comparison of success status and complications in peyronie disease patients: penile plication versus plaque incision and grating techniques

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 780 - 784, 30.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1310131

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of tunical lengthening and shortening techniques for the surgical management of Peyronie's disease (PD) in terms of penile length, patient satisfaction, and complications.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on PD patients who underwent surgical procedures between January 2017 and May 2023 at a single institute. Patient demographics, comorbidities, penile curvature, penile length, and surgical techniques were evaluated. The surgical procedures included plaque incision and grafting, and tunical plication. Post-operative data, including penile length, residual curvature, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and erectile function, were collected at 1-12 months of surgery.
Results: A total of 36 patients (mean follow-up period: 432.25±121.14 days) underwent surgical procedures for PD. Penile length in the tunical lengthening group (13.04±1.62 cm) was significantly longer than in the tunical shortening group (10.85±1.24 cm, p=0.001). Tunical shortening procedures were associated with a higher rate of penile shortening (57.1% vs. 6.7%, p=0.001) and suture-related discomfort (38.1% vs. 6.7%, p=0.031) compared to tunical lengthening procedures. Patient satisfaction was higher in the tunical lengthening group (80% vs. 66.7%, p=0.378). There was no significant difference in painful erection during penetrations or incapability of intercourse between the groups. The average length of hospital stay was longer for tunical shortening surgery compared to tunical lengthening surgery (1.27±0.27 vs. 1.79±0.39, p=0.023).
Conclusion: Tunical lengthening procedures demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of penile length and suture-related discomfort compared to tunical shortening procedures for the surgical management of PD. Patient satisfaction was also higher in the tunical lengthening group. Clinicians should consider various factors when selecting the appropriate surgical technique for PD, including penile length, the degree of penile curvature, and surgeon experience. Prospective randomized studies are needed to further validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

References

  • Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health-2021 Update: Male Sexual Dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80(3):333-357. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.007
  • de la Peyronie F: Sur quelques obstacles qui s’opposent à l’éjaculation naturelle de la semence. Mem Acad Roy Chir. 1743:1:425.
  • Rosen R, Catania J, Lue T, et al. Impact of Peyronie's disease on sexual and psychosocial functioning: qualitative findings in patients and controls. J Sex Med. 2008;5(8):1977-1984. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00883.x
  • Ziegelmann MJ, Trost LW, Russo GI, Levine LA. Peyronie's disease intervention studies: an exploration of modern-era challenges in study design and evaluating treatment outcomes. J Sex Med. 2020;17(3):364-377. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.271
  • Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Conti SL, Turek P, Lue T. Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med. 2008;5(9):2179-2184. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00949.x
  • Akkus E, Kadioglu A, Esen A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in Turkey: a population-based study. Eur Urol. 2002;41(3):298-304. doi:10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00027-1
  • Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 1997;158(6):2149-2152. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68184-9
  • Levine LA, Larsen SM. Surgery for Peyronie's disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):27-34. doi:10.1038/aja.2012.92
  • Akkus E, Ozkara H, Alici B, et al. Incision and venous patch graft in the surgical treatment of penile curvature in Peyronie's disease. Eur Urol. 2001;40(5):531-537. doi:10.1159/000049831
  • Ainayev Y, Zhanbyrbekuly U, Gaipov A, et al. Comparison of Technical Success and Adverse Events of Plaque Incision and grafting methods in patients with peyronie's disease: tunica vaginalis versus buccal mucosa. Urology. 2022;170:226-233. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.063
  • Ainayev Y, Zhanbyrbekuly U, Gaipov A, et al. Surgical reconstruction of penile curvature due to Peyronie's disease by plaque incision and buccal mucosa graft. J Sex Med. 2021;18(7):1308-1316. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.04.009
  • Cormio L, Mancini V, Massenio P, et al. Combined plaque incision, buccal mucosa grafting, and additional tunica albuginea plication for peyronie's disease. Sex Med. 2019;7(1):48-53. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2018.11.002
  • Chow AK, Sidelsky SA, Levine LA. Surgical outcomes of plaque excision and grafting and supplemental tunica albuginea plication for treatment of peyronie's disease with severe compound curvature. J Sex Med. 2018;15(7):1021-1029. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.642
  • Barrett-Harlow B, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. New Developments in surgical treatment for penile size preservation in Peyronie's disease. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7(1):156-166. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.07.001
  • .Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Sansalone S. Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie's disease using circular and longitudinal grafting. BJU Int. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E213-E219. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11582.x
  • Tahra A, Küçük EV, İnkaya A. Peyroni hastalığının hafif ve orta şiddetli kurvatür tedavisinde plikasyon ve greftleme cerrahisi ile sonuçlarımız. Androl Bul. 2017;19:6-9. https://doi.org/10.24898/ tandro.2017.46547.
  • Başer A, Çelen S, Bütün S, et al. Peyroni cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörler. Pam Tıp Derg. 2020;13(3):705-713.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Urology, Reproductive Medicine (Other)
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Çağrı Doğan 0000-0001-9681-2473

Murat Akgül 0000-0001-6187-1940

Cenk Murat Yazıcı 0000-0001-6140-5181

Serkan Şeramet 0000-0003-3774-7979

Hulusi Dayısoylu 0000-0001-8090-4031

Erdem Can Topkaç 0009-0002-5479-7599

Early Pub Date July 28, 2023
Publication Date July 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Cite

AMA Doğan Ç, Akgül M, Yazıcı CM, Şeramet S, Dayısoylu H, Topkaç EC. The comparison of success status and complications in peyronie disease patients: penile plication versus plaque incision and grating techniques. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. July 2023;6(4):780-784. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1310131

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912


Editor List for 2022

Assoc. Prof. Alpaslan TANOĞLU (MD)  

Prof. Aydın ÇİFCİ (MD)

Prof. İbrahim Celalaettin HAZNEDAROĞLU (MD)

Prof. Murat KEKİLLİ (MD)

Prof. Yavuz BEYAZIT (MD) 

Prof. Ekrem ÜNAL (MD)

Prof. Ahmet EKEN (MD)

Assoc. Prof. Ercan YUVANÇ (MD)

Assoc. Prof. Bekir UÇAN (MD) 

Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Sinan DAL (MD)


Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.