Abstract
Objective: Asthma affects more than 300 million people worldwide, patients with asthma often use the Internet as a source of information. Youtube is the world's largest and most visited video site, with 92% of internet users in our country visiting it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of education by analyzing the information content of asthma-related videos on the most commonly used platform.
Materials and Methods: YouTube search was performed using the keyword "astım", including the 100 most Turkish Asthma videos were analyzed for characteristics, source, and content. A scoring system was established to assess quality of video.
Results: One hundred videos were analyzed, subject content was most commonly related to patient education (58%), while the second included videos about alternative treatments(37%). Videos of other health professionals had the highest score. View number of alternative medicine channels was higher than health professionals.
Conclusion: The most watched asthma videos on YouTube platform were evaluated, the videos of health professionals had highest quality, but the videos with the most alternative medicine content were viewed according to their viewing rates. There is a need to produce high-quality, educational materials by asthma healthcare professionals.
Keywords
References
- Türk Toraks Derneği (TTD). Astım Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi. 2016. Turk Thoracic J. 2016;17(1):1-108.
- Global initiative for asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, 2020. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf. Erişim tarihi 21 Haziran 2020.
- Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B, ve ark. Popular on YouTube: A critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015; 36(6):121-126. doi:10.2500/aap.2015.36.3890
- YouTube. http://www.youtube.com. Erişim tarihi 20-30 Haziran 2020.
- YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts 2020. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/. Erişim tarihi 20 Haziran 2020.
- Aydin MF, Aydin MA. Quality and reliability of information available on YouTube and Google pertaining gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104-107. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104107
- Ng CH, Lim GRS, Fong W. Quality of English‐language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;00:1-9. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.13852
- Betschart P, Manolis Pratsinis M, Müllhaupt G, ve ark. Information on Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on YouTube Is Highly Biased and Misleading. BJU Int. 2020;125(4):595-601. doi:10.1111/bju.14971
- Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Garcia P, Basch CE. Content of Widely Viewed YouTube Videos About Celiac Disease. Public Health. 2019;167:147-151. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.004
- Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears. Cureus. 2020;3;12(2):6852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6852
- Ekram S, Debiec KE, Pumper MA, Moreno MA. Content and Commentary: HPV Vaccine and YouTube. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(2):153-157. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.11.001
- Ward B, Bavier R, Warren C, Yan J, Paskhover B. Qualitative Evaluation of Paediatric Surgical Otolaryngology Content on YouTube. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;13:1-3. doi:10.1017/S002221512000016X
- Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, ve ark. Youtube as a source of information on imunization: A content analysis. JAMA. 2017;298:2482-2484. doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, ve ark. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):82469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082469
- Qualities Than Can Make Your Video Go Viral. http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4915/10-Qualities-That-Can-Make-Your-Video-Go-Viral.aspx. Erişim tarihi 22 Haziran 2020.
Abstract
Amaç: Astım dünya genelinde 300 milyondan fazla kişiyi etkilemektedir, astımlı hastalar sıklıkla interneti bir bilgi kaynağı olarak kullanırlar. Youtube ülkemizde internet kullanıcılarının %92 oranla en sık ziyaret ettiği platformların başında gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı astımla ilişkili videoların bilgi içeriklerini analiz ederek videoların eğitim kalitesi değerlendirmektir.
Materyal ve Metot: "Astım" anahtar kelimesini kullanarak Youtube araması yapıldı, en çok izlenen 100 video dahil edildi. Özellikler, kaynak ve içerik açısından analiz edildi. Video kalitesini değerlendirmek için bir puanlama sistemi oluşturuldu.
Bulgular: Yüz video analiz edildi, konu içeriği olarak en sık hasta eğitimi ile ilgili (%58), ikinci sırada alternatif tedavilerle ilgili videolar yer almaktaydı (%37). Diğer sağlık profesyonellerinin videoları en yüksek puana sahipti ve diğer kaynaklardan önemli ölçüde yüksekti. Alternatif tıp kanallarını izlenme sayısı sağlık profesyonellerinin izlenme sayısından yüksekti.
Sonuç: YouTube platformundaki en çok izlenen astım videoları değerlendirildi, içerik analizi yapıldığında sağlık profesyonellerinin videoları en yüksek kalitedeydi, ancak izlenme oranlarına göre bakıldığında en çok alternatif tıp içerikli videoların izlendiği görüldü. Astımla ilgilenen sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından üretilecek daha çok izlenecek yüksek kaliteli, eğitici materyaller üretilmesine ihtiyaç vardır.
Keywords
References
- Türk Toraks Derneği (TTD). Astım Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi. 2016. Turk Thoracic J. 2016;17(1):1-108.
- Global initiative for asthma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, 2020. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf. Erişim tarihi 21 Haziran 2020.
- Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B, ve ark. Popular on YouTube: A critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015; 36(6):121-126. doi:10.2500/aap.2015.36.3890
- YouTube. http://www.youtube.com. Erişim tarihi 20-30 Haziran 2020.
- YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts 2020. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/. Erişim tarihi 20 Haziran 2020.
- Aydin MF, Aydin MA. Quality and reliability of information available on YouTube and Google pertaining gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104-107. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104107
- Ng CH, Lim GRS, Fong W. Quality of English‐language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;00:1-9. doi:10.1111/1756-185X.13852
- Betschart P, Manolis Pratsinis M, Müllhaupt G, ve ark. Information on Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on YouTube Is Highly Biased and Misleading. BJU Int. 2020;125(4):595-601. doi:10.1111/bju.14971
- Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Garcia P, Basch CE. Content of Widely Viewed YouTube Videos About Celiac Disease. Public Health. 2019;167:147-151. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.004
- Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears. Cureus. 2020;3;12(2):6852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6852
- Ekram S, Debiec KE, Pumper MA, Moreno MA. Content and Commentary: HPV Vaccine and YouTube. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(2):153-157. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.11.001
- Ward B, Bavier R, Warren C, Yan J, Paskhover B. Qualitative Evaluation of Paediatric Surgical Otolaryngology Content on YouTube. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;13:1-3. doi:10.1017/S002221512000016X
- Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, ve ark. Youtube as a source of information on imunization: A content analysis. JAMA. 2017;298:2482-2484. doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482
- Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, ve ark. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):82469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082469
- Qualities Than Can Make Your Video Go Viral. http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/4915/10-Qualities-That-Can-Make-Your-Video-Go-Viral.aspx. Erişim tarihi 22 Haziran 2020.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Research article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2020 |
| Submission Date | July 11, 2020 |
| Acceptance Date | September 27, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 5 Issue: 4 |
