Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Spinal Posture Scan Study in Girl and Boy Students at First, Fifth and Eighth Grade of Primary School

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 34 - 44, 30.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.52976/vansaglik.1377259

Abstract

In this study, students' spines were examined with the Spinal Mouse device.. First, fifth and eighth grade students studying at Van Vakıfbank primary and secondary school in the 2018-2019 academic year were selected as subjects. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of the measurements by performing posture analysis with the Spinal Mouse device. 86 first-grade students (39 girls-47 boys), 119 fifth-grade students (58 girls-61 boys) and 101 eighth-grade students (53 girls-48 boys) were selected. Measurements were taken for posture evaluation in extension, flexion and erect positions by three different researchers using a Spinal Mouse device. Sacral kyphosis (SK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and thoracal kyphosis (TK) angle measurements of students in a certain age group (7, 11, 14) were determined with a Spinal Mouse device while they were standing. Normal values of continuous measurement values discussed in the study were determined by applying the Shapin-Wilk (n<50) test. Parametric tests were performed on the obtained measurement values. Parametric tests were performed on the obtained measurement values. To calculate group comparisons in terms of continuous variables, One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Independent – T test were applied. After variance analysis, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was preferred to determine different groups. Pearson correlation test was used to determine relationships between measurements and calculate coefficients. Pearson correlation test was used to determine relationships between measurements and calculate coefficients. While the statistical significance level was determined as 5%, SPSS (IBM SPSS For Windows, ver.23) program was preferred. As a result, the presence of deformities was determined mostly in eighth grade students. The results obtained from this study were compared with previous studies on the same subject. Based on the literatures examined and the findings obtained, it was thought that students' sitting positions, carrying bags on their backs and spending too much time in front of the computer may affect the spinal structure, which continues to develop. This study showed that the Spinal Mouse device can be preferred in studies to be carried out in the same direction, as it has features such as being harmless to radioactive methods in determining spinal disorders, being easy to apply and being a simple measuring device.

References

  • Arıncı K, Elhan A (2006). Anatomi. 4. Baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi.
  • Boseker EH, Moe JH, Winter RB, Koop SE (2000). Determination of ‘‘normal’’ thoracic kyphosis: A roentgenographic study of 121 ‘‘normal’’ children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 20, 796-798.
  • Böhm B, Luck B (1984). Physiotheraphy. (Çev. Mİ Arman), Kırklareli, Sermet Yayınevi, 119.
  • Bunnel WP (1984). An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 66, 1381-1387.
  • Carlucci L, Chiu J, Cilifford T (2001). Spinal mouse for assessment of spinal mobility. Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique, 2(1), 30-31.
  • Dere F (1999). Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. 5. Baskı, Adana, Nobel Yayınevi, 765-6.
  • Ecerkale O (2006). Postür Analizinde Symmetrigraf ile Orthoröntegenogram Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, İstanbul. Ergen E (1986). Spor Hekimliği, Sporda Sağlık Sorunları ve Sakatlıklar. Ankara, MEB Yayınevi, 25.
  • Frank JS, Earl M (1990). Coordination of posture and movement. Physical Therapy, 70(12), 855-863.
  • Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Clements J, MacPherson B (1984). Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 66(7), 104-855.
  • Hasday CA, Passoff TL, Perry J (1983). Gait abnormalities arising from iatrogenic loss of lumbar lordosis secondary to Harrington instrumentation in lumbar fractures. Spine, 8(5), 501-511.
  • Ito E (1991). Roentgenographc analyss of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine, 16, 6-75.
  • Kasai T, Ikata T, Katoh S, Myake R, Tsubo M (1996). Growth of the cervical spine with special reference to its lordosis and mobility. Spine, 20, 635-639.
  • Kellis E, Adamou G, Tzilios G, Emmanouilidou M (2008). Reliability of spinal range of motion in healthy boys using a skin-surface device. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31, 570-576.
  • Kendall FP, Mcceary EK, Provance PG (1993). Muscles Testing and Function. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 71-84.
  • Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983). Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine, 8(5), 489-500. Köse N, Sevencan A (2007). Konjenital skolyoz ve torasik yetmezlik sendromu. Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği, 6, 3-4.
  • Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR, Betz RR, Labelle H (2004). Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine, 29(15), 1642-7.
  • Mannion, AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D (2004). A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. European Spine Journal, 13(2), 122-136.
  • Moore KL, Persaud TVN (1998). The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology. 5th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, 354-360.
  • Moore MJ, White GL, Moore DL (2007). Association of relative backpack weight with reported pain, pain sites, medical utilization, and lost school time in children and adolescent. Journal of School Health, 77(5), 232-239.
  • Muratlı S (1987). Sportif Hareketlerin Biyomekanik Temelleri. Ankara, M.E.B Yayınevi, 57-74.
  • Otman S (1995). Tedavi hareketlerinde temel değerlendirme prensipleri. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, 14-20.
  • Pacelli LC (1994). Postür üzerine dobra dobra bir konuşma. Spor ve Tıp Dergisi, 21.
  • Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, et al (1996). Measurement of lumbar lordosis, Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver and technique variability. Spine, 21, 15-303.
  • Ripani M, Di Cesare A, Giombini A, Agnello L, Fagnani F, Pigozzi F (2008). Spinal curvature: comparison of frontal measurements with the Spinal Mouse and radiographic assessment. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48(4), 488.
  • Sakallioglu F, Dogan AA, Turkan M, Zavallioglu H, Bas M (1998, 16-18 March). Analysis of trunk flexibility of male and female athletes and non-athletes. Lecture presented at: 1st Sports Congress Proceedings, Erzurum, Türkiye.
  • Schulz S (1999). Measurement of shape and mobility of the spinal column: Validation of the Spinal Mouse by comparison with functional radiographs Macumutrans University, Luduig, Munich.
  • Unur E, Ülger H, Ekinci N (2009). Anatomi. 3. Baskı, Kayseri, Kıvılcım Kitapevi, 13-17.
  • Voutsinas SA, MacEwen DG (1986). Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 210, 235-42.
  • Wiltse LL, Winter RB (1983). Terminology and measurement of spondylolisthesis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 65, 76-87.

İlköğretim Birinci, Beşinci ve Sekizinci Sınıf Kız ve Erkek Öğrencilerde Spinal Mouse ile Omurga Duruşu Taraması Çalışması

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 34 - 44, 30.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.52976/vansaglik.1377259

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Spinal Mouse cihazı ile öğrencilerin omurgaları incelendi. Denek olarak 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılında Van Vakıfbank ilk ve orta okulunda eğitim gören birinci, beşinci ve sekizinci sınıf öğrencileri seçildi. Çalışmada Spinal Mouse cihazı ile postür analizinin yapılarak ölçümlerin sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi hedeflendi. Birinci sınıfa devam eden 86 (39 kız-47 erkek), beşinci sınıfa devam eden 119 (58 kız-61 erkek) ve sekizinci sınıf öğrencisi olan 101 (53 kız-48 erkek) denek tercih edildi. Spinal Mouse cihazı kullanılarak üç farklı araştırmacı ile ekstansiyon, fleksiyon ve erekt pozisyonlarda postür değerlendirmesi için ölçümler alındı. Belirli yaş grubuna (7, 11, 14) dahil olan öğrencilerin ayakta durduksacral ları esnada sacral kifoz (SK), lumbal lordoz (LL), ve thoracal kifoz (TK) açı ölçümleri Spinal Mouse cihazı ile belirlendi. Çalışmada ele alınan sürekli ölçüm değerlerinin normal değerlei Shapin-Wilk (n<50) testi uygulanarak tespit edildi. Elde edilen ölçüm değerlerine parametrik testler yapıldı. Sürekli değişkenler yönünden grup karşılaştırmalarını hesaplamak için ise Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) ile Bağımsız – T testi uygulandı. Varyans analizi tespitinden sonra farklı grupların belirlenebilmesi için Least Significant Difference (LSD) testi tercih edildi. Pearson korelasyon testi ise ölçümler arası ilişkileri belirlemede ve katsayıları hesaplamada kullanıldı. İstatistiki açıdan anlamlılık düzeyi %5 olarak belirlenirken SPSS (IBM SPSS For Windows, ver.23)programı tercih edildi. Sonuç olarak deformitelerin varlığı yoğun olarak sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinde belirlendi. Daha önce aynı yönlü yapılan çalışmalarla bu çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı. İncelenen kaynaklara ve elde edilen bulgulara dayanılarak öğrencilerin oturma pozisyonlarının, sırtta çanta taşımalarının ve bilgisayar başında fazla vakit geçirmelerinin gelişmeye devam eden omurga yapısını etkileyebileceği düşünüldü. Yapılan bu çalışmada Spinal Mouse cihazının omurga bozukluklarını belirlemede radyoaktif yöntemlere zararsız olması, uygulanabilirlik kolaylığı ve basit bir ölçüm cihazı olması gibi özellikleri taşıması açısından aynı yönlü yapılacak olan çalışmalarda bu cihazın tercih edilebileceğini sergiledi.

Thanks

Van İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğüne teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Arıncı K, Elhan A (2006). Anatomi. 4. Baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi.
  • Boseker EH, Moe JH, Winter RB, Koop SE (2000). Determination of ‘‘normal’’ thoracic kyphosis: A roentgenographic study of 121 ‘‘normal’’ children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 20, 796-798.
  • Böhm B, Luck B (1984). Physiotheraphy. (Çev. Mİ Arman), Kırklareli, Sermet Yayınevi, 119.
  • Bunnel WP (1984). An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 66, 1381-1387.
  • Carlucci L, Chiu J, Cilifford T (2001). Spinal mouse for assessment of spinal mobility. Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique, 2(1), 30-31.
  • Dere F (1999). Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. 5. Baskı, Adana, Nobel Yayınevi, 765-6.
  • Ecerkale O (2006). Postür Analizinde Symmetrigraf ile Orthoröntegenogram Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, İstanbul. Ergen E (1986). Spor Hekimliği, Sporda Sağlık Sorunları ve Sakatlıklar. Ankara, MEB Yayınevi, 25.
  • Frank JS, Earl M (1990). Coordination of posture and movement. Physical Therapy, 70(12), 855-863.
  • Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Clements J, MacPherson B (1984). Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 66(7), 104-855.
  • Hasday CA, Passoff TL, Perry J (1983). Gait abnormalities arising from iatrogenic loss of lumbar lordosis secondary to Harrington instrumentation in lumbar fractures. Spine, 8(5), 501-511.
  • Ito E (1991). Roentgenographc analyss of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine, 16, 6-75.
  • Kasai T, Ikata T, Katoh S, Myake R, Tsubo M (1996). Growth of the cervical spine with special reference to its lordosis and mobility. Spine, 20, 635-639.
  • Kellis E, Adamou G, Tzilios G, Emmanouilidou M (2008). Reliability of spinal range of motion in healthy boys using a skin-surface device. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31, 570-576.
  • Kendall FP, Mcceary EK, Provance PG (1993). Muscles Testing and Function. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 71-84.
  • Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983). Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine, 8(5), 489-500. Köse N, Sevencan A (2007). Konjenital skolyoz ve torasik yetmezlik sendromu. Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği, 6, 3-4.
  • Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR, Betz RR, Labelle H (2004). Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine, 29(15), 1642-7.
  • Mannion, AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D (2004). A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. European Spine Journal, 13(2), 122-136.
  • Moore KL, Persaud TVN (1998). The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology. 5th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, 354-360.
  • Moore MJ, White GL, Moore DL (2007). Association of relative backpack weight with reported pain, pain sites, medical utilization, and lost school time in children and adolescent. Journal of School Health, 77(5), 232-239.
  • Muratlı S (1987). Sportif Hareketlerin Biyomekanik Temelleri. Ankara, M.E.B Yayınevi, 57-74.
  • Otman S (1995). Tedavi hareketlerinde temel değerlendirme prensipleri. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, 14-20.
  • Pacelli LC (1994). Postür üzerine dobra dobra bir konuşma. Spor ve Tıp Dergisi, 21.
  • Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, et al (1996). Measurement of lumbar lordosis, Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver and technique variability. Spine, 21, 15-303.
  • Ripani M, Di Cesare A, Giombini A, Agnello L, Fagnani F, Pigozzi F (2008). Spinal curvature: comparison of frontal measurements with the Spinal Mouse and radiographic assessment. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 48(4), 488.
  • Sakallioglu F, Dogan AA, Turkan M, Zavallioglu H, Bas M (1998, 16-18 March). Analysis of trunk flexibility of male and female athletes and non-athletes. Lecture presented at: 1st Sports Congress Proceedings, Erzurum, Türkiye.
  • Schulz S (1999). Measurement of shape and mobility of the spinal column: Validation of the Spinal Mouse by comparison with functional radiographs Macumutrans University, Luduig, Munich.
  • Unur E, Ülger H, Ekinci N (2009). Anatomi. 3. Baskı, Kayseri, Kıvılcım Kitapevi, 13-17.
  • Voutsinas SA, MacEwen DG (1986). Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 210, 235-42.
  • Wiltse LL, Winter RB (1983). Terminology and measurement of spondylolisthesis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 65, 76-87.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Clinical Sciences (Other)
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Dilara Büyükikiz 0000-0002-2834-8207

Gamze Çakmak 0000-0002-3970-3040

Publication Date April 30, 2024
Submission Date October 17, 2023
Acceptance Date January 23, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Büyükikiz, D., & Çakmak, G. (2024). Spinal Posture Scan Study in Girl and Boy Students at First, Fifth and Eighth Grade of Primary School. Van Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.52976/vansaglik.1377259

ISSN 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBnZPknmjKO2vn7ExYwjsL0g4cijty6VTFQQ&usqp=CAU CABI-Logo_Accessible_RGB.png  logo-e1506365530266.png ici2.png 

8c492a0a466f9b2cd59ec89595639a5c?AccessKeyId=245B99561176BAE11FEB&disposition=0&alloworigin=1asos-index.png  Root Indexing    ResearchBib BASE Logo      


Creative Commons Lisansı

Van Health Sciences Journal (Van Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi) başlıklı eser bu Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

  open-access-logo.png  search-result-logo-horizontal-TEST.jpg