Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 372 - 376, 21.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.912295

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Harky A, Chaplin G, Chan JSK, et al. The future of open heart surgery in the era of robotic and minimal surgical interventions. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29: 49-61.
  • de Heer F, Gökalp AL, Kluin J, et al. Measuring what matters to the patient: health related quality of life after aortic valve and thoracic aortic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 37–43
  • Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Stoica L, et al. Open heart surgery: one-year self-assessment of quality of life and functional outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1598-604.
  • Youtube official blog;"https://blog.youtube/press/#:~: text=Over%202%20Billion%20logged%2Din,watchtime%20 comes%20from%20mobile%20devices".
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105-11.
  • Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2019; 1: 109-14.
  • Greene KA, Wyman AM, Scott LA, Hart S, Hoyte L, Bassaly R. Evaluation of patient preparedness for surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 179.e1-179.e7.
  • Kempenich JW, Willis RE, Fayyadh MA, et al. Video-based patient education improves patient attitudes toward resident participation in outpatient surgical care. J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 61-7.

The role of YouTube® videos in heart surgery decision

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 372 - 376, 21.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.912295

Öz

Background: Finding a surgeon and center they can trust is essential for a patient who will be for heart surgery. YouTube® is a modern method at this decision stage as a visual source of information that includes many user comments. In this study, we examined how accurately YouTube® resources guide patients.
Method: The social media platform's official page (https://www.youtube.com) was used for this research. Keywords "heart surgery," "open-heart surgery," "robotic heart surgery" were selected as keywords for related video searches. Advertising promotions and videos with game content have been removed from search results. As the videos' evaluation criteria included in the study, relevance, date added, the number of views, views/likes rate, the descriptive response rate to comments, and video quality were determined.
Result: The most popular 1069 videos were evaluated between 05.10.2020 - 05.01.2021. Of these, 70 videos with the highest level of interest were evaluated. Video views median value is 26401 (IQR; 4968-1998337). Engagement rate median value 0,55 (IQR 0,40 -0,88). Average value median 1,67 (IQR 0,35 – 10,68). The comment/subscriber rate median value was 0.0010% (IQR; 0.0233% - 0.0585%).
Conclusion: Despite the ease of access to information sources in the information age, the importance of face-to-face meetings is still indispensable in information transfer. Because when it comes to illness, people look for knowledge, trust, and complacency. Patients want to know the person they will entrust their health to and ask questions repeatedly, even if it is the same question. Video sources can still only give a preliminary idea.

Kaynakça

  • Harky A, Chaplin G, Chan JSK, et al. The future of open heart surgery in the era of robotic and minimal surgical interventions. Heart Lung Circ 2020; 29: 49-61.
  • de Heer F, Gökalp AL, Kluin J, et al. Measuring what matters to the patient: health related quality of life after aortic valve and thoracic aortic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 37–43
  • Falcoz PE, Chocron S, Stoica L, et al. Open heart surgery: one-year self-assessment of quality of life and functional outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1598-604.
  • Youtube official blog;"https://blog.youtube/press/#:~: text=Over%202%20Billion%20logged%2Din,watchtime%20 comes%20from%20mobile%20devices".
  • Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 105-11.
  • Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2019; 1: 109-14.
  • Greene KA, Wyman AM, Scott LA, Hart S, Hoyte L, Bassaly R. Evaluation of patient preparedness for surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 179.e1-179.e7.
  • Kempenich JW, Willis RE, Fayyadh MA, et al. Video-based patient education improves patient attitudes toward resident participation in outpatient surgical care. J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 61-7.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orijinal Makale
Yazarlar

Akın Arslan 0000-0003-1380-6102

Yayımlanma Tarihi 21 Mayıs 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Arslan A. The role of YouTube® videos in heart surgery decision. J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm. Mayıs 2021;4(3):372-376. doi:10.32322/jhsm.912295

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği:  Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç  uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]

Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.

Not:
Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.

Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show 


Dergi Dizin ve Platformları

Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.

Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.