Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 5, 1259 - 1266, 25.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Charley Kline Sends the First Message Over the ARPANET from Leonard Kleinrock's Computer : History of Information [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=1108
  • The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin and Where Could It Go Next? [Internet]. Maryville Online 2020 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/
  • Lawal N. Top Five Academic Social Networking Sites for Scholars and Students [Internet]. Medium 2017 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://medium.com/@NurdinLawal/top-five-academic-social-networking-sites-for-scholars-and-students-5b146e674f84
  • Doktorların Sosyal ve Akademik Sosyal Medya Kullanımı, Sosyal Medya Yardımı ile Hastalarıyla İletişim Kurması [İnternet]. Google Docs. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSePohU0bYNTpscHlyGTlarY8kf6ixPpOjzvXF51tSrNuRax5w/viewform?usp=send_form&usp=embed_facebook
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2019 Yayınlanmıştır [Internet]. T.C. Saglik Bakanligi. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,84966/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019-yayinlanmistir.html
  • DIGITAL 2022: Another Year Of Bumper Growth [Internet]. We Are Social UK 2022 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
  • Güler ÖGE. Akademik Personelin Akademik Sosyal Ağları Kullanim Düzeyi: Anadolu Üniversitesi 2013; 6.
  • Imran MK, Iqbal SMJ, Aslam U, Fatima T. Does social media promote knowledge exchange? A qualitative insight. Manag Decis 2019; 57: 688–702.
  • Brown J, Ryan C, Harris A. How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e267.
  • von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 777–81.
  • The Platform Doctors Trust for Online Video Education. VuMedi [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.vumedi.com/
  • Meishar-Tal H, Pieterse E. Why do academics use academic social networking sites? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn [Internet] 2017; 18. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2643

Examining social media and academic social network use, and trends in physician-patient communication via social media: a national study

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 5, 1259 - 1266, 25.09.2022
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Öz

Introduction: In the history of the internet, social media occupy an exceptional place because they bring about sociological changes and cause things that will influence the course of history. It has become inevitable to conduct a study that examines the changes in the relationship between academic social networks and online patient-physician relationships, which have become widespread in recent years, especially among physicians. This study attempted to address this deficiency.
Material and Method: An online survey was created on Google Forms that included questions about physicians' use of social and academic media networks and their communication habits with online patients. Age, gender, medical specialty and workplace, social media use, academic social networks usage, and relationships with patients via social media were analyzed.
Results: Daily social media usage was significantly associated with age and medical specialty. Participants aged 40-50 and Basic Medic Science Consultants were least likely to use social media. The use of Facebook was the lowest among those under 30 (12.2%). Among those under 30, the use of LinkedIn was deficient (2.0%). Google Scholar was the most frequently used academic social network (38.5%). Surgical specialists were more likely to share medical content. Under 30 and over 50 were more likely to share their medical titles on social media than other groups. The percentage of those who reported having also physically examined the patient during online communication was 64.5%. This high rate is by no means negligible. Patients' most frequent responses to online communication requests were via WhatsApp (80.3%). The under-30 age group was found to have less contact with patients on social media.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, the use of the academic social network is lower than expected, even among academically active participants. The fact that Facebook usage is significantly lower among those under 30 suggests that Facebook is outdated as a social medium for young physicians. Participants in university hospitals, private clinics, and those under 40 use social media differently than other groups. More online patient communication is an important advance. It is also significant that the number of studies has increased after online communication. If investments are made in this topic, it can be expected that a substantial part of patient-doctor relationships will be handled online soon. However, social media studies wear out quickly, so they should be repeated frequently.

Kaynakça

  • Charley Kline Sends the First Message Over the ARPANET from Leonard Kleinrock's Computer : History of Information [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=1108
  • The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin and Where Could It Go Next? [Internet]. Maryville Online 2020 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/
  • Lawal N. Top Five Academic Social Networking Sites for Scholars and Students [Internet]. Medium 2017 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://medium.com/@NurdinLawal/top-five-academic-social-networking-sites-for-scholars-and-students-5b146e674f84
  • Doktorların Sosyal ve Akademik Sosyal Medya Kullanımı, Sosyal Medya Yardımı ile Hastalarıyla İletişim Kurması [İnternet]. Google Docs. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSePohU0bYNTpscHlyGTlarY8kf6ixPpOjzvXF51tSrNuRax5w/viewform?usp=send_form&usp=embed_facebook
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı TC. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2019 Yayınlanmıştır [Internet]. T.C. Saglik Bakanligi. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,84966/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2019-yayinlanmistir.html
  • DIGITAL 2022: Another Year Of Bumper Growth [Internet]. We Are Social UK 2022 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022-another-year-of-bumper-growth-2/
  • Güler ÖGE. Akademik Personelin Akademik Sosyal Ağları Kullanim Düzeyi: Anadolu Üniversitesi 2013; 6.
  • Imran MK, Iqbal SMJ, Aslam U, Fatima T. Does social media promote knowledge exchange? A qualitative insight. Manag Decis 2019; 57: 688–702.
  • Brown J, Ryan C, Harris A. How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e267.
  • von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 777–81.
  • The Platform Doctors Trust for Online Video Education. VuMedi [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.vumedi.com/
  • Meishar-Tal H, Pieterse E. Why do academics use academic social networking sites? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn [Internet] 2017; 18. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2643
Toplam 12 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orijinal Makale
Yazarlar

Deniz Gürler 0000-0001-7992-3278

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 5

Kaynak Göster

AMA Gürler D. Examining social media and academic social network use, and trends in physician-patient communication via social media: a national study. J Health Sci Med /JHSM /jhsm. Eylül 2022;5(5):1259-1266. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1117561

Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği:  Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç  uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]

Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.

Not:
Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.

Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show 


Dergi Dizin ve Platformları

Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.

Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.