Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous patients: validity, reliability and comparison with a visual analogue scale
Öz
Objectives: OHIP-EDENT is a shortened version of the Oral Health Impact Profile instrument The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the Turkish version of it (OHIP-EDENT-TR) for the elderly population in Turkey.
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 edentulous patients (72 males, 48 females; mean age 65.59 ± 7.61 years) who had complete prostheses were included in the study. The patients completed the OHIP-EDENT-TR, which was translated during this study, and a visual analogue scale (100 mm) twice at an interval of 3 months. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR. The interclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR and its subscales were calculated.
Results: The lowest and highest reliabilities were obtained for questions 7 (n = 120, α = 0.888) and 2 (α = 0.931), respectively. The reliability of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR was good (α = 0.903). There was a significant relationship between the OHIP-EDENT-TR scale and visual analogue scale scores (p < 0.001). These values were indicative of fair-to-excellent convergent validity.
Conclusions: The Turkish version of OHIP EDENT (OHIP-EDENT-TR) is a reliable, valid and applicable scale for evaluating oral health related quality of life in the Turkish elderly patients.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:400-5.
- 2. Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci 2009;51:535-43.
- 3. Slade GD, Strauss RP, Atchison KA, Kressin NR, Locker D, Reisine ST. Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes--measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health 1998;15:3-7.
- 4. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90.
- 5. Leon S, Correa-Beltran G, De Marchi RJ, Giacaman RA. Ultra-short version of the oral health impact profile in elderly Chileans. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017;17:277-85.
- 6. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Yamaga E, Minakuchi S. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Gerodontology 2012;29:e1033-7.
- 7. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:446-50.
- 8. Balci N, Alkan N, Gurgan CA. Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the oral health impact profile-14. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:19-24.
- 9. Souza RF, Patrocinio L, Pero AC, Marra J, Compagnoni MA. Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:821-6.
- 10. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology 1993;46:1417-32.
- 11. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91.
- 12. Moss S, Patel P, Prosser H, Goldberg D, Simpson N, Rowe S, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in older people with moderate and severe learning disability. I: Development and reliability of the patient interview (PAS-ADD). Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:471-80.
- 13. Shrestha B, Niraula SR, Parajuli PK, Suwal P, Singh RK. Reliability and Validity of a Nepalese Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Subjects. J Prosthodont 2018;27:416-20.
- 14. He SL, Wang JH. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Qual Life Res 2015;24:1011-6.
- 15. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
- 16. Possebon A, Faot F, Machado RMM, Nascimento GG, Leite FRM. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis of the OHIP-Edent instrument. Braz Oral Res 2018;32:e111.
Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous patients: validity, reliability and comparison with a visual analogue scale
Öz
Objectives: OHIP-EDENT is a shortened version of the Oral Health Impact Profile instrument The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the Turkish version of it (OHIP-EDENT-TR) for the elderly population in Turkey.
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 edentulous patients (72 males, 48 females; mean age 65.59 ± 7.61 years) who had complete prostheses were included in the study. The patients completed the OHIP-EDENT-TR, which was translated during this study, and a visual analogue scale (100 mm) twice at an interval of 3 months. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR. The interclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR and its subscales were calculated.
Results: The lowest and highest reliabilities were obtained for questions 7 (n = 120, α = 0.888) and 2 (α = 0.931), respectively. The reliability of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR was good (α = 0.903). There was a significant relationship between the OHIP-EDENT-TR scale and visual analogue scale scores (p < 0.001). These values were indicative of fair-to-excellent convergent validity.
Conclusions: The Turkish version of OHIP EDENT (OHIP-EDENT-TR) is a reliable, valid and applicable scale for evaluating oral health related quality of life in the Turkish elderly patients.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:400-5.
- 2. Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci 2009;51:535-43.
- 3. Slade GD, Strauss RP, Atchison KA, Kressin NR, Locker D, Reisine ST. Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes--measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health 1998;15:3-7.
- 4. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90.
- 5. Leon S, Correa-Beltran G, De Marchi RJ, Giacaman RA. Ultra-short version of the oral health impact profile in elderly Chileans. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017;17:277-85.
- 6. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Yamaga E, Minakuchi S. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Gerodontology 2012;29:e1033-7.
- 7. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:446-50.
- 8. Balci N, Alkan N, Gurgan CA. Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the oral health impact profile-14. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:19-24.
- 9. Souza RF, Patrocinio L, Pero AC, Marra J, Compagnoni MA. Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:821-6.
- 10. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology 1993;46:1417-32.
- 11. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91.
- 12. Moss S, Patel P, Prosser H, Goldberg D, Simpson N, Rowe S, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in older people with moderate and severe learning disability. I: Development and reliability of the patient interview (PAS-ADD). Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:471-80.
- 13. Shrestha B, Niraula SR, Parajuli PK, Suwal P, Singh RK. Reliability and Validity of a Nepalese Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Subjects. J Prosthodont 2018;27:416-20.
- 14. He SL, Wang JH. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Qual Life Res 2015;24:1011-6.
- 15. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
- 16. Possebon A, Faot F, Machado RMM, Nascimento GG, Leite FRM. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis of the OHIP-Edent instrument. Braz Oral Res 2018;32:e111.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Diş Hekimliği |
| Bölüm | Araştırma |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Aralık 2021 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 2 Aralık 2020 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 |
Selcuk Dental Journal Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.